"Double Jeopardy" Appraisals the Second Time Around
(December 1992)

With the exceptional number of refinance loans this year, many appraisers are being asked to update a prior appraisal or to reappraise a property.

When faced with such a request, some appraisers simply duplicate the information contained in their initial report. Unfortunately, it is quite possible that an error was made the first time around. By not taking the time to verify or double check the information, the appraiser could unknowingly repeat the same error or fail to detect an otherwise easily discoverable mistake.

Here are two examples of claims caused when appraisers did not reexamine data used in the initial reports:

Claim #1
An appraiser received an assignment to appraise a single family residence for refinance purposes. He inspected the property, prepared his report and submitted it to the lender. Less than a year later, the lender requested an update. This time, the appraiser only did a drive-by inspection, found no new sales comparables and simply provided a letter of opinion stating that there had been no change in value.

What the appraiser did not know was that after the original inspection, the house was rented to tenants with a large, rambunctious dog that did extensive damage to the interior. When this damage was discovered at the time of foreclosure, the lender decided to litigate against the appraiser due to the drop in property value. The lender maintains that this decrease is due in large part to the deterioration of the property`s interior condition.

Claim #2
When an appraiser inspected a single family residence for a purchase mortgage in 1989, he unknowingly over estimated the structure`s square footage.

After making certain cosmetic improvements to the property, the owner applied for refinancing in 1991. The same appraiser was asked to evaluate the property. He did not remeasure the square footage, but simply copied over the incorrect figure from his original report.

The owner refinanced a second time in January of 1992. Again, the same person appraised the property and used the same square footage data.

A few months ago, the owner listed the home for sale. Relying on his copies of the three appraisals, the owner represented that the house contained 3,800 square feet. The new buyer recently discovered the correct square footage and is seeking damages against the former owner. In turn, the former owner has indicated that he will seek indemnity from the appraiser due to the appraiser`s square footage misrepresentations.

While the appraiser`s liability in the above claims might be questionable, each lawsuit will still be expensive to defend. If each appraiser had taken the time to carefully reinspect both the property and the original report, these claims might have been avoided.

Try to treat each appraisal as a brand new assignment--even if it is only an update or a reappraisal. Do not automatically assume that nothing has changed or that everything you did the first time was correct. Verify information you received from outside sources. Recheck all of your computations. Go back and remeasure square footage.

The time it takes to do a thorough review is time well spent if it helps to avoid an errors and omissions claim. Do not take the easy way out to play a game of "DOUBLE JEOPARDY."


Copyright 1992. Liability Insurance Administrators. All rights reserved.

OTHER CLAIM ALERTS:
The Appraisal Workfile:
The Best Tool You Have to Aid in Your Own Denense

(August 2009)
Avoiding Appraisal Fraud: Appraising Your Client
(September 2008)
CLAIMS DO'S & DON'TS
(August 2007)
Washington State Appraisers Beware!
(Updated February 13, 2007)
Identity Theft, Forgery & Other "Altered" States
(July 2006)
The Cost Approach: To Do or Not To Do
(May 2006)
Construction Progress Reports: Don`t Get Hammered
(October 2005)
New Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac URAR Form - Ambiguities and Liabilities
(Updated November 2005)
Appraising After a Natural Disaster
(Updated October 2007)
VACANT LAND: A Nightmare for an Appraiser
(October 2004)
E-Appraisal Technology: High Tech or High Risk?
(September 2000)
PHOTOS: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
(April 2004)
USING TRAINEES - The Safe Way
(Updated November 2005)
Licensing Board Administrative Notice:
Your immediate attention is required!
(February 2003)
Predatory Lending:
Spot Predators Before They Risk Your Career
(December 2002)
Mold: The Hidden Menace
(April 2002)
Limiting Liabilities to Third Parties
(November 2001)
Appraiser or Home Inspector? - Increased Expectations Blur the Line
(April 2001)
Flipping: Dangerous Maneuvers for Appraisers
(June 2001)
Managing Exposure in the Face of HUD Reforms
(October 1999)
Real Estate Scams: Don`t Be the Next Victim!
(October 1998)
Threatened With a Lawsuit?
A Call in Time May Save Your Peace of Mind
(July 1997)
Engagement Letters
(July 1996)
The Defense Calls for...Your Appraisal Report
(July 1995)
Signing an Employment Agreement:
More May Be on the Line Than Just Your Signature
(September 1994)
Appraising After an Earthquake:
Is Your Liability Exposure on Shaky Ground?
(March 1994)
"Double Jeopardy" Appraisals the Second Time Around
(December 1992)
Home > Claim Alert Newsletters > "Double Jeopardy" Appraisals the Second Time Around
© 2009 Liability Insurance Administrators Site by WaltersGroup