|

"DOUBLE JEOPARDY"
Appraisals the Second Time Around
With the exceptional
number of refinance loans this year, many appraisers are being asked to
update a prior appraisal or to reappraise a property.
When faced with such
a request, some appraisers simply duplicate the information contained
in their initial report. Unfortunately, it is quite possible that an error
was made the first time around. By not taking the time to verify or double
check the information, the appraiser could unknowingly repeat the same
error or fail to detect an otherwise easily discoverable mistake.
Here are two examples
of claims caused when appraisers did not reexamine data used in the initial
reports:
Claim #1
An appraiser
received an assignment to appraise a single family residence for refinance
purposes. He inspected the property, prepared his report and submitted
it to the lender. Less than a year later, the lender requested an update.
This time, the appraiser only did a drive-by inspection, found no new
sales comparables and simply provided a letter of opinion stating that
there had been no change in value.
What the appraiser
did not know was that after the original inspection, the house was rented
to tenants with a large, rambunctious dog that did extensive damage to
the interior. When this damage was discovered at the time of foreclosure,
the lender decided to litigate against the appraiser due to the drop in
property value. The lender maintains that this decrease is due in large
part to the deterioration of the property's interior condition.
Claim #2
When an appraiser inspected a single family residence for a purchase mortgage
in 1989, he unknowingly over estimated the structure's square footage.
After making certain cosmetic improvements to the property, the owner
applied for refinancing in 1991. The same appraiser was asked to evaluate
the property. He did not remeasure the square footage, but simply copied
over the incorrect figure from his original report.
The owner refinanced
a second time in January of 1992. Again, the same person appraised the
property and used the same square footage data.
A few months ago,
the owner listed the home for sale. Relying on his copies of the three
appraisals, the owner represented that the house contained 3,800 square
feet. The new buyer recently discovered the correct square footage and
is seeking damages against the former owner. In turn, the former owner
has indicated that he will seek indemnity from the appraiser due to the
appraiser's square footage misrepresentations.
***********************************************
While the appraiser's liability in the above claims might be questionable,
each lawsuit will still be expensive to defend. If each appraiser had
taken the time to carefully reinspect both the property and the original
report, these claims might have been avoided.
Try to treat each
appraisal as a brand new assignmenteven if it is only an update
or a reappraisal. Do not automatically assume that nothing has changed
or that everything you did the first time was correct. Verify information
you received from outside sources. Recheck all of your computations. Go
back and remeasure square footage.
The time it takes
to do a thorough review is time well spent if it helps to avoid an errors
and omissions claim. Do not take the easy way out to play a game of "DOUBLE
JEOPARDY."
|